<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Oracle BI Enterprise Edition vs Cognos BI</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ykud.com/blog/cognos/oracle-bi-enterprise-edition-vs-cognos-bi/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ykud.com/blog/cognos/oracle-bi-enterprise-edition-vs-cognos-bi</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 00:11:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ykud</title>
		<link>http://ykud.com/blog/cognos/oracle-bi-enterprise-edition-vs-cognos-bi/comment-page-1#comment-26504</link>
		<dc:creator>ykud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2010 14:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ykud.com/blog/?p=255#comment-26504</guid>
		<description>Hello, Marek. 

First of all, I&#039;m sure you know, that this limitation is solved by MultipleFileThreshold option )

Oracle has 2 OLAP engines. 
1) Oracle OLAP option -- lives in database, is nice tool, very similar to size limitations of Transfomer, but much more flexible when it comes to modeling. I&#039;d write a separate post about it if you&#039;re interested
2) Oracle Essbase -- an ex-Hyperion MOLAP-engine, very expensive and very performant. I&#039;ve built billion non-zero cells cubes in it with ease and seen it scale very good on concurrent analytical sessions

Security in Cognos BI and Oracle BI? I&#039;ve wrote about some troubles &lt;a href=&quot;http://ykud.com/blog/cognos/connecting-bi-system-to-active-directory-oracle-bi-vs-ibm-cognos-bi-scripts-to-extract-active-directory-information&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;I&#039;ve encountered while integrating Oracle BI and Active Directory here&lt;/a&gt;. All in all, it&#039;s the same limiting &#039;where clause&#039;, but I&#039;d prefer Cognos.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, Marek. </p>
<p>First of all, I&#8217;m sure you know, that this limitation is solved by MultipleFileThreshold option )</p>
<p>Oracle has 2 OLAP engines.<br />
1) Oracle OLAP option &#8212; lives in database, is nice tool, very similar to size limitations of Transfomer, but much more flexible when it comes to modeling. I&#8217;d write a separate post about it if you&#8217;re interested<br />
2) Oracle Essbase &#8212; an ex-Hyperion MOLAP-engine, very expensive and very performant. I&#8217;ve built billion non-zero cells cubes in it with ease and seen it scale very good on concurrent analytical sessions</p>
<p>Security in Cognos BI and Oracle BI? I&#8217;ve wrote about some troubles <a href="http://ykud.com/blog/cognos/connecting-bi-system-to-active-directory-oracle-bi-vs-ibm-cognos-bi-scripts-to-extract-active-directory-information" rel="nofollow">I&#8217;ve encountered while integrating Oracle BI and Active Directory here</a>. All in all, it&#8217;s the same limiting &#8216;where clause&#8217;, but I&#8217;d prefer Cognos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marek</title>
		<link>http://ykud.com/blog/cognos/oracle-bi-enterprise-edition-vs-cognos-bi/comment-page-1#comment-26501</link>
		<dc:creator>Marek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2010 08:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ykud.com/blog/?p=255#comment-26501</guid>
		<description>How about OLAP?
Cognos in Transformer has &quot;limitation&quot; with 2 GB pre one file. Does Oracle has same problem?
And second question how is security compare to Cognos?

Marek</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about OLAP?<br />
Cognos in Transformer has &#8220;limitation&#8221; with 2 GB pre one file. Does Oracle has same problem?<br />
And second question how is security compare to Cognos?</p>
<p>Marek</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BI and CPM Gartner Quadrants &#8216;10 are out &#124; Applied dimensionality</title>
		<link>http://ykud.com/blog/cognos/oracle-bi-enterprise-edition-vs-cognos-bi/comment-page-1#comment-22607</link>
		<dc:creator>BI and CPM Gartner Quadrants &#8216;10 are out &#124; Applied dimensionality</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 11:58:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ykud.com/blog/?p=255#comment-22607</guid>
		<description>[...] PS: Just to notice, they say aggregate awareness for Cognos BI is in beta-testing. Just after I spent so much space promoting database-level aggregate navigation. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] PS: Just to notice, they say aggregate awareness for Cognos BI is in beta-testing. Just after I spent so much space promoting database-level aggregate navigation. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

