Comments for Applied dimensionality http://ykud.com/blog Thu, 20 Nov 2008 20:33:31 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2 Comment on More on real-time reporting on Contributor by Ben http://ykud.com/blog/cognos/more-on-real-time-reporting-on-contributor#comment-6007 Ben Thu, 13 Nov 2008 01:33:28 +0000 http://ykud.com/blog/?p=186#comment-6007 Thanks Yuri! - I used that to automatically run an admin link between elist items for inter-company activity when ever the datadatetime changed. Thanks Yuri! - I used that to automatically run an admin link between elist items for inter-company activity when ever the datadatetime changed.

]]>
Comment on A couple of small, but oh-so vital Cognos Enterprise Planning Enchancements by tsilla http://ykud.com/blog/analyst/a-couple-of-small-but-oh-so-vital-cognos-enterprise-planning-enchancements#comment-5914 tsilla Tue, 11 Nov 2008 21:25:31 +0000 http://ykud.com/blog/?p=150#comment-5914 Hi, I want to vote for at least the 1st and the 2nd :-) thanks! Hi,
I want to vote for at least the 1st and the 2nd :-)
thanks!

]]>
Comment on DMR’s pros and cons by ykud http://ykud.com/blog/cognos/dmrs-pros-and-cons#comment-4817 ykud Thu, 23 Oct 2008 23:33:05 +0000 http://ykud.com/blog/?p=197#comment-4817 Hi, Bob. Well, 20 mln of data doesn't seem big enough to start causing troubles on Ms SQL 2005. Although your "circular joins" are a bit worriyng -- there shouldn't be anything like circular joins in well-designed reporting scheme. If it's possible, I'd like to look at your current design, to see if there are are any improvements at database level.. 10 mins of data processing for query isn't reasonable time (although it depends on your hardware as well) to do analysis, 5s-1m is only interval possible. DMRs are pretty good on performance side, when you've got a good DBA nearby to tune up the SQL server itself and your FrameWork manager scheme is pretty straight-forward (just a simple star, for example). In other cases, it may turn out usefull to build some aggregate (in your case, full) cognos powerplay cubes to speed up query processing. - Yuri. Hi, Bob.

Well, 20 mln of data doesn’t seem big enough to start causing troubles on Ms SQL 2005. Although your “circular joins” are a bit worriyng — there shouldn’t be anything like circular joins in well-designed reporting scheme. If it’s possible, I’d like to look at your current design, to see if there are are any improvements at database level..

10 mins of data processing for query isn’t reasonable time (although it depends on your hardware as well) to do analysis, 5s-1m is only interval possible.

DMRs are pretty good on performance side, when you’ve got a good DBA nearby to tune up the SQL server itself and your FrameWork manager scheme is pretty straight-forward (just a simple star, for example). In other cases, it may turn out usefull to build some aggregate (in your case, full) cognos powerplay cubes to speed up query processing.

- Yuri.

]]>
Comment on DMR’s pros and cons by Bob http://ykud.com/blog/cognos/dmrs-pros-and-cons#comment-4760 Bob Wed, 22 Oct 2008 22:33:29 +0000 http://ykud.com/blog/?p=197#comment-4760 Hello, We are trying to build out a DMR with Cognos 8.3 and MS SQL 2005 (32 bit). Our consultant suggested the idea of a DMR and said that performance would not be a problem. Our consultant then quite to work for another firm and we are left in the lurch to figure this out on our own. Our fact table is currently about 20 mln records; 8 years of data. If you joined all the tables as they are used by the OLTP, you end up with a pretty big snowflake with several circular joins. We have imported that tables from a replicated copy of the OLTP, created views on the database and have imported the tables and views into FM. The views were built anywhere we created a snowflake in our model so that our model is a star schema in FM. We have not dimensionalized the data yet beyond this - no hierarchies. When we run a query agains a years worth of records (about 2 million records), it can take up to 10 minutes to return. Is this normal, or are we missing something? Any ideas on how to improve the performance? Thanks, Bob Hello,

We are trying to build out a DMR with Cognos 8.3 and MS SQL 2005 (32 bit). Our consultant suggested the idea of a DMR and said that performance would not be a problem. Our consultant then quite to work for another firm and we are left in the lurch to figure this out on our own.

Our fact table is currently about 20 mln records; 8 years of data. If you joined all the tables as they are used by the OLTP, you end up with a pretty big snowflake with several circular joins.

We have imported that tables from a replicated copy of the OLTP, created views on the database and have imported the tables and views into FM. The views were built anywhere we created a snowflake in our model so that our model is a star schema in FM.

We have not dimensionalized the data yet beyond this - no hierarchies.

When we run a query agains a years worth of records (about 2 million records), it can take up to 10 minutes to return.

Is this normal, or are we missing something?

Any ideas on how to improve the performance?

Thanks,

Bob

]]>
Comment on Event manager usage by ykud http://ykud.com/blog/cognos/event-manager-usage#comment-4706 ykud Tue, 21 Oct 2008 18:02:17 +0000 http://ykud.com/blog/?p=188#comment-4706 Hi, Robby. Seen you on Communities as well. I'll add your suggestion to this post Thanks for reading ) Hi, Robby.

Seen you on Communities as well.

I’ll add your suggestion to this post

Thanks for reading )

]]>
Comment on Event manager usage by Robby Meyers http://ykud.com/blog/cognos/event-manager-usage#comment-4673 Robby Meyers Mon, 20 Oct 2008 23:07:41 +0000 http://ykud.com/blog/?p=188#comment-4673 Hey Yuri, I found your site and have seen your posts on Cognos Communities. I work in Finance and one of the uses we have for event studio is automated weekly, monthly reporting. New Hire Requisition reports, Actuals vs Budget for Operating Expenses and Capital Expenditures etc. Purchase Req's over a certain amount are setup in a report and automated so that they can be reviewed on a timely basis with upper management. Thanks for posting this wealth of information! Hey Yuri,
I found your site and have seen your posts on Cognos Communities.

I work in Finance and one of the uses we have for event studio is automated weekly, monthly reporting.

New Hire Requisition reports, Actuals vs Budget for Operating Expenses and Capital Expenditures etc. Purchase Req’s over a certain amount are setup in a report and automated so that they can be reviewed on a timely basis with upper management.

Thanks for posting this wealth of information!

]]>
Comment on DMR’s pros and cons by ykud http://ykud.com/blog/cognos/dmrs-pros-and-cons#comment-4430 ykud Wed, 15 Oct 2008 18:54:25 +0000 http://ykud.com/blog/?p=197#comment-4430 Hi, Rob. In my experience, it only took some minor tuning (switching to native sql for fact tables) and then Star transformations worked brilliantly. I'm currently using 10mln row fact tables with star queries and it works pretty nice. Can you share some details on your configuration (oracle + cognos versions) and generated sql? Yuri. Hi, Rob.

In my experience, it only took some minor tuning (switching to native sql for fact tables) and then Star transformations worked brilliantly. I’m currently using 10mln row fact tables with star queries and it works pretty nice.

Can you share some details on your configuration (oracle + cognos versions) and generated sql?

Yuri.

]]>
Comment on DMR’s pros and cons by Rob http://ykud.com/blog/cognos/dmrs-pros-and-cons#comment-4415 Rob Wed, 15 Oct 2008 10:34:26 +0000 http://ykud.com/blog/?p=197#comment-4415 Hi Have you had any issues with DMR performance? The Cognos SQL rewrite in Analysis Studio means that the query never utilises star transformation, and therefore causes 'nested loops', which have a knock on effect on perfomance. Regards Rob Hi

Have you had any issues with DMR performance?

The Cognos SQL rewrite in Analysis Studio means that the query never utilises star transformation, and therefore causes ‘nested loops’, which have a knock on effect on perfomance.

Regards
Rob

]]>
Comment on More on Contrib APs. by Applied dimensionality - A couple of small, but oh-so vital Cognos Enterprise Planning Enchancements http://ykud.com/blog/cognos/more-on-contrib-aps#comment-3759 Applied dimensionality - A couple of small, but oh-so vital Cognos Enterprise Planning Enchancements Tue, 16 Sep 2008 09:48:38 +0000 http://ykud.com/blog/2006/10/11/more-on-contrib-aps/#comment-3759 [...] sometime it helped and we now have allocation tables in administration links. Although I'm sure my post didn't have any impact, some deem hope [...] [...] sometime it helped and we now have allocation tables in administration links. Although I’m sure my post didn’t have any impact, some deem hope [...]

]]>
Comment on Cognos Community by ykud http://ykud.com/blog/cognos/cognos-community#comment-2990 ykud Tue, 26 Aug 2008 05:26:24 +0000 http://ykud.com/blog/?p=193#comment-2990 Hi Akil. You can use <a href="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/bb896653.aspx" rel="nofollow">process explorer</a> to see trnsfrmr.exe properties, where one of the file handles will be the model used. Hi Akil.

You can use process explorer to see trnsfrmr.exe properties, where one of the file handles will be the model used.

]]>